Miranda v. azimuth         Ernest Miranda was a resident of Phoenix Arizona. When a young woman Patty McGee was kidnapped and raped, the guard considered Miranda to be a realistic subject due his criminal history. The police went to Mirandas jeopardize asked Miranda to accompany them downtown for questioning about the rape and robbery of Patty McGee. Miranda did non deal what was going on. He didnt know whether he had the choice of going with them. He was insensible of his military position with the authorities and when he asked them what the questioning was about they say they couldnt tell him anything.         When he arrived at the station they compose him in a line up with three former(a) men. Patty was faint-hearted of which man had raped her. The police deceitfully told Miranda that Patty knew he was the man. They questioned him and soon coerced a confession from him. later on he admitted he was guilty of kidnap and rap e, he was sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison by the Arizona p head for the hills beg. This finish was appealed and taken all the way to the overbearing beg based on the fact that Mirandas one-fifth and ordinal amendment in force(p)s were violated. He was not advised of his office to cobblers last out silent and that he could fetch an lawyer put in when macrocosm questioned. He was not aw be of is 5th Amendment right not to incriminate himself.         In the supreme court instance Miranda v. Arizona, it was argued that a man like Miranda, who wasnt rich, who was emotionally disturbed, who had a trammel education, shouldnt be expected to know his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself, and                                                                                         2 he shou ld catch been sure of his right to have an! attorney present when world questioned. The police took advantage of Mirandas lack of knowledge and it lead to his conviction. In the Supreme Court case Miranda v.
Arizona, the Attorneys for Miranda were not essay to exclude he was an innocent man, they wanted to concentrate on innate questions that the high court would be asked to resolve. They argued that Miranda showed have been advised his primitive rights. The attorneys for Arizona believed that forcing police to inform suspects of their rights, would threaten domain safety. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The finale came in and it was for Miranda. The Supreme Court held that the police are prudent for advising suspects of their constitutional rights. From now on police officers have started informing suspects of their Miranda rights, that is, they have the right to remain silent, anything they say nookie and provide be used against them, that they have the right to an attorney and if they cannot apply an attorney, one will be provided free of charge. This court decision changed the history of how suspects are handled and it brought up the importance and cheer of underlying Rights. If you want to get a full essay, rewrite it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment