Nuclear Power Advantages and Disadvantages

thermo atomic Power Advantages and DisadvantagesThe title question of my case study is Should thermo atomic Power be Banned. I hit chosen this question as I cerebrate it is a key topic at this express moment in life, with a component part of tuition about it in the media, such as on the news and in the papers for each genius day. Also it is several(prenominal)thing that will affect the life in which we live in the future. So beca work of these curtilages it is aboutthing that sight need to be aw be of and need to re onlyy understand what atomic function is and how it is affecting us or is passing play to affect us in the years to come.Evidence forOne study problem that could occur with nuclear motive is that thither is always the try that in that location could be a leakage of radio make believeive fluids, which will arrive a massive impact on the environment and its surroundings. These radioactive fluids that whitethorn leak from the billet stations fag en d ca routine whoremongercers and very(prenominal) damaging illnesses in cosmoss. So for this reason people will believe that yes, nuclear provide should be banned, especi entirelyy those people living around or near a nuclear baron station, or those that charter finis relatives that may be stirred if something like this were to happen.-I commend that this is a received report of information as it is a very valid reason, and flowerpot be found elsewhere on the internet, on various dissimilar sites which proves to us that early(a) people argon to a fault using this information as demo for their arguments, so we should as well.Evidence a offstA reason against banning thermonuclear force-out is that it provides a lot of our zippo characters, and butt joint be used to generate electrical energy and to reason ships, so accordingly we need nuclear government agency to continue doing these things, and if we were to bump disembarrass of it indeed we would lone (prenominal) bear to resort to finding an some other way of providing this energy, which is only going to follow even more money, on top of what espouse already be paying to get rid of the nuclear place plants that exist at this moment in succession.. Without the use of the ships that atomic number 18 cater by the nuclear power, we would have a lot of difficulty in transporting goods such as food and material from one line to another.(http//uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090121112744AAxRJTv)25th kinsfolk 2010, 1030. I think that this is a genuinely safe initiation of information in the respect that it is a reasonable argument for why we shouldnt ban nuclear power. Although this may also be seen as not so true as it is pen by a member of the public, someone that may not have a lot of knowledge on the topic, more everyplace has heard bits about it. Besides that detail, I agree with this argument against banning nuclear power so thusly am going to use it as e vidence in my case study.SCIENCE BEHIND NUCLEAR POWERNuclear power is made and generated by using atomic number 92. Uranium is a coat that is mined in various contrasting parts of the world. Most on worlds Uranium is mined from Australia, Canada and Kazakhstan.The first ever large-scale nuclear power station was opened in 1956, in England in the city of Cumbria at a place called Calder Hall.There are a number of armed services ships and submarines that contain nuclear power plants as their engines in order for them to stay fresh up and running.Nuclear power produces approximately 11% of the worlds energy source and atomic number 50 produce very large amounts of energy from only a small amount of fuel. As well as this in that respect isnt all the pollution along with it like on that point is when you burn fossil fuels.(This can at that placefore be seen as an argument against banning nuclear power plants as at that place is the burning of fossil fuels that is taking place whi ch are producing greater amounts of pollution than what nuclear power stations are freehanded sour.)The equation above shows us what happens in a nuclear power plant and the stages in which it goes th savage before it reaches our homes and provides us with the energy sources that we use in everyday life.It is in the Nuclear fission where the Uranium is used, this starts off the edge for nuclear power to be generated. Nuclear fission is the process of atoms splitting, so when a heavy sum such as Uranium splits into two smaller, lighter nuclei. In this reaction, the strong nuclear top executive which is the engaging force, is acting on the electrostatic force which is the repulsive force, these can be knocked out of balance on each other when they gain the energy from either a photon or a neutron. The two forces are affected by the gain of this other element and will try to act on each other to regain the state in which they were in, but in nuclear fission the electrostatic f orce will gain more power than the nuclear force, consequently causing it to repel and for the nucleus to split apart, also releasing energy as it does so.To make this more or less easier to understand, imagine a load of marbles in a rough circle shape on a flat tabletop (this is going to be representing the original atoms nucleus, where all the forcing are acting the corresponding on one another and are equal, so all the marbles/atoms are stable). What if I were to indeed throw or roll another marble into this group of stable marbles? All the marbles would spread apart and get out into the space around them, this marble that is being rolled into them is acting as the photon or neutron that is being gained in the nucleus. This is unbalancing the forces and causing the atoms to all prevail around as they react to the change that is taking place, but comprehend as all the marbles move out, and away from each other shows to us that the repelling force has gained more control, a s the attractive force wasnt able to keep them all together, and this is exactly what happens in nuclear fission.(http//library.thinkquest.org/17940/texts/fission/fission.html)(http//physics.about.com/od/glossary/g/nuclearfission.htm)Both of the sites above were visited on the thirtieth January 2011, 1515.-I think that both of these sites are reliable sites to use as evidence in my case study, and one of them is a site specifically focusing on physics topics and defys very scientific definitions to certain topics problematical in physics. Also the other site is made by university students, that did a study on nuclear fission and how it takes place, they then put all their information together on this site for other students to look at and use if they need the information required. I have combined the information from both websites to give an overall example of how nuclear fission takes place and what it involves.Nuclear power that is made by Uranium is not renewable, this heart t hat once we have dug up the Earths ply of Uranium there will be no other way of getting whatsoever more, so once its gone its gone.There are several advantages and disadvantages to nuclear power these includeNuclear power costs roughly the same amount as coal, so in that respect its not excessively expensive, so this is an advantage.Although, millions of pound has to be spent each year to lend the rubber that is required in a power plant, this is because if they were to take the outlook and something went wrong like a nuclear cerebrovascular solidus, then this would result in a major disaster.The making of nuclear power does not give off a smoke or carbon dioxide, so therefore we can be sure that this is not contributing to the greenhouse put together that is causing globular warming, unlike the burning of fossil fuels which do put forward to this, so this then puts nuclear power at an advantage.Also, as mentioned previously, coarse amounts of energy can be made by on the dot a small amount of fuel. With only small amounts of waste being produced, once again putt nuclear power at an advantage.Saying that, although there isnt much waste being produced, that that is produced is extremely dangerous and would have to be stored, sealed up and buried for thousands of years to allow the radioactivity to conk away. During this time it has to be kept far away from any electromotive force natural disasters such as Earthquakes, Volcanic eruptions, flooding and terrorist attacks. This can be very difficult at times.Another disadvantage is that in the nineties was the fastest growing source of power in most of the world. However, in 2005 this then deteriorated to being the second slowest growing source of power without the world.(http//www.darvill.clara.net/altenerg/nuclear.htm)30thJanuary 2011, 1700.-This is a website purely base of evidence for and against nuclear power, and its advantages and disadvantages, it has lots of information solely on nuclear power, which makes it a reliable source of evidence to be used.There are legion(predicate) different reasons and opinions to why people think nuclear power should be banned, some of which are due to things that have happened previously, and if were to happen again could cause a massive uproar throughout the world. Others are what people are excite could happen, and because of this they believe that nuclear power should be banned.Here are some examples of previous accidents that have happened involving nuclear power, which could be a reason influencing peoples decisions on whether or not this should be bannedMarch 28, 1979Near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Americas wrap up nuclear accident occurred. A partial melt blast of one of the reactors agonistic the evacuation of the residents after radioactive mishandle escaped into the atmosphere.The radioactive gas that got released into the atmosphere is a cause to cancer in the human body, and as we all know, cancer push downs very eas ily It may take 20 years or so, for the residents to even realise that they have cancer, as it takes time to affect and the gas in the atmosphere lingers for years.April 26, 1986The worlds worst nuclear accident occurred after an explosion and fire at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. It released radiation syndrome over much of Europe. Thirty-one people died in the immediate outcome of the explosion. Hundreds of thousands of residents were moved from the area and a similar number are believed to have suffered from the effects of radiation exposure.As you can see already from this 31 innocent people died from a nuclear power accident, thats hundreds of people left over(p) without a family member, and what if this was to happen again, but this time it could be even worse, and mayhap even more people killed. Also from this event, thousands and thousands of people were once again exposed to the radiation which can cause cancerous cells in our bodies, which could return to a number of deaths years down the line, all from this one accident that happened because of nuclear power.(http//www.atomicarchive.com/Reports/Japan/Accidents.shtml)25th September 2010, 1930.-This website is a university website, which is very factual and all its points appear to be logical and true, also the fact that its scientists writing the points and information only gives us more reason to believe its true and reliable.Many risks are taken when using nuclear power, there is always the risk of a meltdown occurring, or even a leakage of radioactive waste. There is also a risk to the workers guard and well-being as storing waste from nuclear reactors can be a problem in some cases. A nuclear meltdown is when the cool down systems fail, and the nuclear reactors reach such a temperature that they melt straight through the reactor or damage the reactor wall. With this melting, then allows the spread of radioactivity, which as before can cause great damage in the human body. There is also the chance of contamination within the environment if there was to be a leakage of radioactive waste in that area. hot waste, if gotten into the workers at a nuclear power plant, can also poison them, which furthermore, would take their life.On the other hand, there are also many reasons as to why people believe that nuclear power shouldnt be banned, some of which are listed belowNuclear power generation does distribute relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2). The emissions of green house gases and therefore the voice of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little.This applied science is readily available it does not have to be developed first.It is potential to generate a high amount of electrical energy in one single(a) plant.(http//timeforchange.org/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power-and-sustainability)28th October 2010, 1735.-I think that this is a reliable website to get information from as it is based on the pros and cons of nuclear power, a nd what needfully to be through to make a change, and what needs to stay the same. It cannot be edited or changed by anyone other than the creators, and the creators are have done a lot of research to make the website to the high standard of what it is now.In 2005, approximately 6.3% of the earths energy supply relied on nuclear power, and gradually over the years, this has increased slightly to 14% in 2009. It also provided 15% of the worlds electricity in 2005 and again in 2009. If we were to ban nuclear power then there would have to be other ways in which this supply of electricity was formed, and therefore more money is going to have to be spent out in order for this supply of electricity.As you can see from the statements above, it clearly states that nuclear power can generate a lot of electrical energy in just one single plant, and with there being 440 plants across the world this would cost an awful lot of money to get rid of and then replace the energy and electricity in which it supplies us with.Nuclear power also provides for ships and submarines, which we need to transport food and goods from country to country, without these ships we would have to find another way of transporting the items, tell apart if we were to use a plane for example, then this would only be adding to global warming which is another issue known world-wide.(http//www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf01.html)27th September 2010, 1835.-I believe this graph to be a reliable source of evidence as it is from a website specifically focused on the use of nuclear power all over the world, in various different countries. Also it is not biased in any way, and it completely based on facts and figures rather than opinions, so therefore this is a reliable piece of information to be used in this case study.As you can see from the graph above, most of the large MEDC (More Economically Developed) countries reply on nuclear power as a source of energy and electricity. Although there are other ways of them getting their energy supply, with the loss of nuclear power, they would only have to increase one or more of their other supplies in order to make up for what they have lost from the overleap of nuclear power.SHOULD NUCLEAR POWER BE BANNED?Taking into measure both sides of the argument, we can see that there are many reasons for nuclear power being banned, just as well as reasons for nuclear power to not be banned. The main reason that people believe nuclear power should be banned is that there is always the risk of a spillage of nuclear gases, or a leak in the power stations, which would have a great impact on humans health. The main reason as too why nuclear power shouldnt be banned is that it provides a huge amount of the worlds energy and electricity source.As you can see from the for and against arguments on the previous pages, I think that overall the benefit of nuclear power outweighs the risk so therefore nuclear power SHOULDNT be banned, and I think this becauset o get rid of all the nuclear power stations over the world would cost an awful lot of money for the governments and thats money that could be put to a better use elsewhere. Also after paying out to get rid of the nuclear power plants throughout the earth, we would then also have to pay for other methods of providing the electricity and energy resources that these plants provided, it would be easier and more cost-effective to just spend the money into finding more ways in which we can prevent a leakage at a power plant and how we would handle such a situation, if another one were to occur. Nuclear power plays too big a role in everyday life, we just take it for granted and dont actually realise how much we do rely on it.Furthermore, as for the number of deaths that have occurred from nuclear power accidents there are so many things nowadays that could kill people, we just try not to look at them in that way, for instance there could be a massive pile-up on a motorway and kill a nume rous amount of drivers, passengers and general citizens, but that doesnt mean that people are going to stop driving does it? So why should nuclear power be banned because of the risk of there being a fault that could cause deaths among humans? The workers in nuclear power plants, are fully aware of the risks they take every day and the risks of the radiation, but safety measures are in place to protect these workers from getting harmed, and they are teach of what to do in the case of emergency, so therefore its entirely down to them to do the job or not, at no point are they being forced to work under such conditions that are putting themselves at risk.