The Marketing of Honda Motorcycles in the USA

The American Honda Motor Company was established as a subsidiary by Honda in 1959. During the 1960s the type of pedals brought by Americans underwent a major change. Motorcycle registrations increase by over 800,000 in five years from 1960. In the previous(predicate) 60s the major competitors were Haley Davidson of U. S. A, BSA, Triumph and Norton of the UK and Motto Guzzi of Italy. Harley-Davidson had the bouffantst grocery deal with gross gross revenue in 1959 tot onlying a6. 6 million dollars.Many of the motorcycles produced were large and bulky and this light-emitting diode to the moving picture f the motorcycle rider as being one who wore a leather jacket and went The Boston Consulting Group ( BCG ) communicate was initiated by the British establishment to study the decline in British motorcycle companies round the world, especially in the USA where sales had dropped from 49% in 1959 to 9% in 1973. The twain key factors the report identified was the market share l oss and profit cleverness declines an the scale economy disadvantages in technology, distri yetion, and manufacturing.The BCG report showed that victor of the Japanese manufacturers started with the growth of their own domestic markets. The high production for omestic request led to Honda experiencing economies of scale as the cost of producing motorbikes declined with the level of output. This deliver the goodsd Honda to achieve a highly competitive cost position which they used to penetrate into the US market. The basic philosophy of the Japanese manufacture is that high volumes per model provide the potential for high productivity as a force of victimization capital intensive and highly automated techniques.Their marketing strategies are and so directed towards developing these high model volumes, hence the careful solicitude that we have observed them giving to growth and market The report goes on to show how Honda built up engineering competencies finished the innovatio n of Mr Honda. The high society too moved away from early(a) companies who relied upon distributors to sell their bikes when the community secure up its headquarters in the westward coast of America. The BCG found that the motorcycles gettable in front Honda entered the market were for limited group of mint such as the police, army etc.But Honda had a policy of selling, non in the beginning to confirmed motorcyclists but rather to members of the general public who had never before given a second aspect to a motorcycle( SP p. 16 ). The small, lightweight Honda Supercub sold at under 250 dollars compared to the bigger American or British machines which were retailing at around 1000 to 1500 dollars. In 1960 Hondas look team comprised of around 700 designer and engineer staff compared to the 100 or so employed by their competitors showing the value which the company put on innovation.Production per man-year was 159 units in 1962, a figure not reached by Harley-Davidson Hon da was sideline a dodging of developing region by region. over a period of four to five years they moved from the west coast of America o the east coast. The report showed the emphasis which Honda remunerative to announce when the company spent heavily on the advertising make-up you meet the nicest good deal on a Honda thereby disassociating themselves from the rowdy, hells angels type of people. essentially the BCG is portraying Honda as a firm dedicated to being a low cost producer, utilising its dominant position in Japan to soak up entry into the U. S market, redefining that market by putting up the nicest people image and exploiting its comparative advantage via Pascale tends to disagree on many points of the BCG report. The report uggests that there was a smooth entry into the U. S market which led to an instant advantage. Pascale argues that Honda entered the American market at the end of the motorcycle administer season showing their impotence to carry out researc h in the new market.As they entered the market at the wrong sentence sales were not as good as they should have been and any success was not going to be instantaneous. Pascale also criticises the assumption that Honda was superior to other competitors in productivity. He says that Honda was successful in Japan with productivity but circumstances indicate that the company was not superior. The lack of funding from the ministry of finance and the ploughing back of profits into inventory meant they had a tight budget to follow. The BCG report shows that Honda had a smooth policy of developing region by region, moving from the west to the east.Pascale response is that this is partly true but reminds that Hondas advertising was still in Los Angeles in 1963, four years after pose up their subsidiary. The report to the British government showed that Honda had a deliberate scheme of disassociating themselves from the hells angels type of people by following the nicest people advertiseme nt policy. Pascale shows that this was not an intentional move since there were disputes deep down the company with the director of sales eventually persuading to management against their better judgement.The BCG report found Honda pushed into the U. S market with small lightweight motorbikes. However Pascale says this is again not true. He argues the intend strategy was one of promoting the larger 250cc and 350cc as Honda felt that this was what the market cute since Americans liked all things large. The bikes were unreliable which led to the promotion of the supercubs. These bikes salvaged the reputation of the company. An dea which precisely came from an inspired idea but one of desperation.Overall Pascale gives the impression that it was through an incidental sequence of events which led to Honda gaining a strong hold in the U. S market, mainly through the unexpected discovery of a large untapped segment of the market while at the same time trying to retain the The criticism made by Pascale can be further analysed by looking at the The strengths of Honda start with the roles which the founders played. Honda was an inventive magnificence with a large ego and a volatile temperament. His main concerns were not about the profitability of the ompany or its products, but rather to show his innovative ability by producing better engines. Fujisawa on the other hand thought about the financial section of the company and how to market the ideas.He oftentimes challenged Honda to come up with better engines. By specialising in their own abilities the deuce of them were able to pool together resources Another strength was the way the company utilised its market position. Strengths in design advantages and production methods meant they were able to increases sales in Japan even though there was no physical composition within the company. Once there was a large enough beseech for its products, mainly the supercub, Honda both in Japan and in America, moved from a sale on consignment basis to one that required notes on delivery.This seemed a very risky decision to make at the time but within three years they had changed the pattern within the motorcycle industry by shifting the power relationship from the head to the manufacturer. Mr Honda had cultivated a success against all odds culture into the company. This was tried and true when he sent two executives to the U. S with no strategy other than to see if they could sell something. The weaknesses within an organisation can become inappropriate if the strategy is strong and there is good leadership. An element of luck also helped Honda follow an emerging strategy.Restrictions placed on capital by the government for the U. S venture forced Honda to take aim an alternative route. If they had all the funds necessary they may well have gone through the form distribution Honda entered the us market right at the end of the motorcycle trade season. When leaking oil and clutch problems occurred on their bikes it did not affect Honda as hard as it would have had they entered in the beginning of the season. Also people noticing the Supercubs led the company to produce a bike which was not at first supported by senior The success of Honda was not the result of senior management coming up with all the answers.In fact senior executives in most Japanese manufacturing companies do not take their strategic positions too seriously. Salesman, cleaners and those working on the manufacturing floor all contribute to the company is run and thereby influence its strategic position. It is this ability of an organisation to move ideas from the tom to the bottom and back again in continuos dialogue that the As a conclusion it is necessary to consider the theory-based side of Hondas strategy and see whether the company was in fact following a model. The first model is the Andrews model.Andrew came up with the idea that there were two stages to corporate strategy, formulation and implementa tion. Formulation involved looking at the market, competitors and resources and formulating a corporate strategy which would be utilise throughout each handle of the organisational structure. This model was also supported by Porter. This is how the BCG saw Honda, as a corporation, who had looked at the market, formulated a strategy to ope with the environment and competition pressures and implemented it, making all Hondas plans and activities deliberate.The second model known as the emergent strategy portrays a different image to the Andrews model and shows how Pascale viewed Honda. The model shows a realised strategy made up from a an intended strategy together with an emergent strategy which is not planned but emerges in relation to activities within the environment. Pascale seemed to think that in Hondas case a square proportion or the companies corporate strategy was emergent and less was in reality intended strategy.