Negotiating in Army Aviation

Negotiating in armament Aviation is rare. It is with child(p) for me to even weigh when a negotiation took place at my workplace. In Army Aviation everything is cut in stone. We have rules to follow and we can non go a steering from the norm. With that said, the only time I had to negotiate at work was with my rifle pilot. We discussed the drill of water buckets and the spring uping I wanted to do with them.

A water bucket is apply to assistance put discover fires. They can be as dwarfish as 60 gallons in capacity all the way up to 2000-gallon capacity, which is what we use for our Chinook helicopters. The style of bucket we use is a hard fiberglass, bottom opening water bucket. Because of the fictional character of bucket we use we try not to use them excessively. When we drive with the bucket they sometimes will amaze dragged through the trees and or thump set on the ground too hard and this will crack or break the fiberglass bucket. each though, we do lack to train with the buckets to maintain proficiency

The wear and inject of the buckets is why we negotiated the preparedness we ask to accomplish. My argument was we still had to train with the buckets even though they had the potential to be damaged. My pilot do the statement that in his career he only used the water bucket five times to put out fires. He stated at that place was no need for either training. I did not feel the same way he did. I thought there was a need for training so my crewmembers would feel favourable with the bucket when a need for it came up. We continued to negotiate back and forth with his argument that there was no need and my argument, we need to train to feel comfortable when we have to use it.

For the style of negotiating we used, I would have to adduce it was more than on the compromise side than any other style. We went back and forth talking as of why we should or should not do the training. We did understand what the other person was opinion or concerned about. We also did focus on the job issues trying to make things work for both(prenominal) sides. I show it was a compromise space because I wanted more training and I did not get all the issues I was trying to achieve. My pilot did not get his way provided in the end he says he was able to get more training for his pilots.

I did not intend to use a compromise approach to the perspective nor did I intend for the situation to happen at all. The situation started when we were talking about except management in the unit. I then brought up that we needed to do more training on our mission equipment. My lead pilot took offence to this statement and asked what I was referring to. I named a few things but the one that was stuck in his mind was the water bucket. As I said before he did not think it was necessary to do the training.

Looking back at the situation now I see it was a good thing to bring up. We both had thought we were doing the necessary training for both crewmembers and pilots but soon found out we needed to do a little more. At first the topic turn into a slight argument but later on turned into a discussion that we both could agree upon. We did signalize what the other person was looking for and in the end we did get this accomplished.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper